CORRUPT HEADS CVC

pj. thomas - Google News

Supreme Court questions PJ Thomas' appointment as Chief Vigilance Commissioner

NDTV.com - ‎Nov 8, 2010‎

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has decided to examine the process of appointment of new Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) PJ Thomas. Thomas' name figured in ...

Produce file on Thomas appointment: Supreme Court The Hindu

SC asks govt for file on vigilance chief Thomas Times of India

Choice of new CVC under SC scanner India Today

nira radia - Queen of brokers

nira radia - Google News

MSN India

ED summons Radia for questioning again

Times of India - Pradeep Thakur - ‎Nov 19, 2010‎

NEW DELHI: Corporate lobbyist Nira Radia, in the thick of 2G controversy, has been summoned afresh by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for questioning next ...

Queen of connections MSN India

Raja aides deny involvement in 2G spectrum scam IBNLive.com

Allegations unverified and unsubstantiated, says VCC Daily News & Analysis

Daily Shopper News

Appeal from a Whistle blower for justice

Appeal from a Whistle blower for justice

IS DOPT IN SLUMBER OR IMPOTENT ?

HOW THE COMMERCE MINISTRY VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION!!!

I was a govt. employee of Export Inspection Agency-a statutory body under Commerce Ministry, covered by CCS Pension Rules of 1972.In 1994 over 700 employees opted for SVRS & govt. partly settled retirement benefits till 1997. We filed cases for not effecting full payment of attended benefits.

Simultaneously after 11years of my efforts I got an original circular of Commerce Ministry dt.21/05/1994 under RTI Act-2005 which exposed that the 1994-VRS scheme itself is not an approved one by the Nodal depts. Also the commerce ministry’s executive fiat which was circulated among employees was deliberately edited by the officials to cheat the employees. So the circular is NULL & VOID & the scheme is ILLEGAL as the Commerce Ministry has violated all the constitutional provisions.

From 2005 I have been approaching various govt. agencies for Justice. With no tangible solutions forthcoming I filed a fresh writ in Madras high court which is still pending. My efforts for a negotiated settlement also failed. My appeals to the Hon’ble PM-incharge of ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension, and the Hon’ble President-custodian of Pension Act-1871 did not receive the attention.

Pension is not a bounty and ministry officials cheated the employees by circulating an executive fiat which suppressed the facts to deprive our fundamental right to pension. When one time legislators demand pension, the govt. employees who have worked for over 20years have been fooled by the fraudulent SVRS-1994 circular & Clandestine action.

DOPT (Dept. of personnel & training) right under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension is breaking the laws of RTI Act-2005 by not taking any steps but making a MOCKERY of entire grievance handling system. For reasons best known to them even CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION IS A MUTE SPECTATOR.

What is the use of systems when babu’s are not working? As long as the responsibilities are not fixed, anybody in power can violate the rules & even constitutional provisions as done by the Commerce ministry officials in 1994.

IN THE NAME OF TRADE LIBERALIZATION THIS FRAUD WAS COMMITTED TO DEPRIEVE PENSION BENEFITS OF EMPLOYEES. SEE THE CONTINUOUS CORRUPTION/SCAMS & THEIR MASSIVE SCALE!!!!

 PLEASE HELP ME TO HIGHLIGHT THIS FRAUD IN THE MEDIA THROUGH YOUR CONTACTS.

                     With regards-VENKATESAN.M

For more details Please visit http://venkym.blogspot.com
http://citizenscharters-amockery.blogspot.com/

Questions public servants are afraid to answer « e – Voice For Justice

Questions public servants are afraid to answer « e – Voice For Justice

The essential feature , lifeline of democracy is information flow between

CITIZENS <– > PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVES <–> PUBLIC SERVANTS. The ” Right to Expression ” is a fundamental right , democratic right of every Indian citizen & also it is a basic human right. To express means to have proper access to information , assimilate it & respond. Inspite of fundamental right of expression TOGETHER WITH INFORMATION , the public servants rarely respected it. The public were forced to go to higher courts to secure their rights which took years & lot of money. The government with a good intention of giving information at affordable costs within a stipulated time frame has framed RTI ACT . IT has caused jitters among public servants , as the informations are opening-up their crimes , corruptions are coming to light. Now , they are opposing disclosing file notings.

The public servants while assuming the government office take a oath that they will carry on their duties without FEAR OR FAVOUR , WITHOUT ILL WILL , BIAS ON ANY GROUNDS & they will strictly uphold the rule of law. However the greedy , corrupt public servants are caste conscious , they base their judgements , reasonings on illegal grounds make notings favouring some , disapproving others. These file notings play a very important role in decision making in government service. As their file notings are not logically based , law abiding , but are based on bribe , favours , based on their personal feelings as human beings , the decisions arrived at based on those notings are not legal as per constitutional terms. This meats out injustices , this is what is happening in government service since independence. Now, RTI ACT wants to put an end to it , however public servants are opposing it. The public servants who oppose the disclosure of their file notings are one who are working against the spirit , letter & objective of their oath of office.

Right To Information Act was brought into force by government of india , to check corruption among public servants & to bring accountability in public service. The public servants are careless about RTI ACT , as they have cunningly diluted the penal provisions of the act & have curbed it’s jurisdiction. On top of it , the public servants have hand picked their favourites & posted them to central information commission & state information commissions. At any cost , these public servants would not let the truth to come out into open , information to become public , as it will be their death knell pointing towards their ill-gotten wealth , riches.

The worst violators of RTI ACT are staff at president of india’s secretariat & the staff at chief justice of india’s office. What a shame to our democracy ?

HRW has appealed to CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & Karnataka State Information Commission , about violation of RTI ACT by public servants , their total disregard for the earlier directions of KSIC . Till date there is no word from KSIC or what action has been taken ? this gross negligence of duty by KSIC is aiding criminals / public servants in burying their crimes. Hereby HRW once again appeals to the KSIC to order the respective public servants to provide the information sought for , my KSIC COMPLAINT NO : KSIC/61/COMPLAINT/2006.
If the constitutional body supposed protect the rights of citizens itself violates it , fate of citizens ? god , help my india. Jai hind , vande mataram.

Your’s sincerely,

Nagaraj.m.r.

DOPT OFFICIALS WASH OFF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS FASION ONLY!!!!!!

REMINDER-1 TO THE HON’BLE MINISTER OF COMMERCE

REMINDER-I

APPEAL & REQUEST TO THE HON’BLE MINISTER OF COMMERCE,GOI SHRI.ANAND SHARMA.

SUB: EXPEDITE CORRECTIVE ACTION ON 1994-ILLEGAL SVRS.

YOUR PREDICISORS IN 1994 HAVE COMMITTED A GRAVE MISTAKE OF FRAMING A SPECIAL VRS TO THE EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL EMPLOYEES IN FRAGRANT VIOLATION OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS & PENSION ACT. IT WAS STEALTHLY IMPLEMENTED BY THE EIC, DEPRIVING THE PENSION BENEFITS OF OVER 800 FAMILIES.

WE REQUEST YOU TO USE YOUR GOOD OFFICES TO SET RIGHT THE MISTAKES BY MODIFYING THE COMMERCE MINISTRY’S CIRCULAR SO AS TO RESTORE THE PENSION RIGHTS OF THE EMPLOYEES.

PENSION IS NOT A BOUNTY & IT CANNOT BE BARTERED EVEN BY THE EMPLOYEE WHO IS PROTECTED BY THE PENSION ACT.

-BY VENKATESAN- AN EMPLOYEE CHEATED BY THE EXPORT INSPECTION AGENCY/COUNCIL OF INDIA.

VENKATESAN.M
Mob:9444030900
Skype:venkym9971
C.C. Blogs/Media

Ennapadam Panchajanya

Ennapadam Panchajanya

Saturday, May 29, 2010

MAHARAJADIRAJA DALIT RAJA SPECTRUM FRAUD OUTSHINES AND OUTCLASSES (ASATYAM) RAJU SATYAM FRAUD-III

APPEAL TO THE HON'BLE COMMERCE MINISTER

APPEAL & REQUEST TO THE HON’BLE MINISTER OF COMMERCE,GOI SHRI.ANAND SHARMA.

SUB: EXPEDITE CORRECTIVE ACTION ON 1994-ILLEGAL SVRS.

YOUR PREDICISORS IN 1994 HAVE COMMITTED A GRAVE MISTAKE OF FRAMING A SPECIAL VRS TO THE EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL EMPLOYEES IN FRAGRANT VIOLATION OF ALL CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS & PENSION ACT. IT WAS STEALTHLY IMPLEMENTED BY THE EIC, DEPRIVING THE PENSION BENEFITS OF OVER 800 FAMILIES.

WE REQUEST YOU TO USE YOUR GOOD OFFICES TO SET RIGHT THE MISTAKES BY MODIFYING THE COMMERCE MINISTRY’S CIRCULAR SO AS TO RESTORE THE PENSION RIGHTS OF THE EMPLOYEES.

PENSION IS NOT A BOUNTY & IT CANNOT BE BARTERED EVEN BY THE EMPLOYEE WHO IS PROTECTED BY THE PENSION ACT.

-BY VENKATESAN- AN EMPLOYEE CHEATED BY THE EXPORT INSPECTION AGENCY/COUNCIL OF INDIA.

VENKATESAN.M
Mob:9444030900
Skype:venkym9971
C.C. Blogs/Media

NEXT SAMPLE FOR MOCKERY OF CITIZEN'S CHARTER

Registration Number	:	PRSEC/E/2010/10698
Name	:	Shri venkatesan.M
Date of Receipt	:	08 Jul 2010
Current Status	:	The petition is transferred
Date of Transfer	:	14 Jul 2010
Ministry/Department	:	Department of Commerce
Officer's Name	:	Shri Shyam Agarwal
Designation	:	Joint Secretary
Address	:	Room No. 132
		Udyog Bhavan
		New Delhi
Telephone No.	:	23061971
E Mail	:	ss.agarwal@nic.in

Note: You are requested to further liaise in the matter directly with Joint Secretary, Department of Commerce, Room No. 132Udyog Bhavan New Delhi for further information.

WILL GIVE HIS REPLY AS SOON AS RECEIVED 

DOPT ,HAND IN GLOVE WITH COMMERCE MINISTRY'S FRAUD ON EMPLOYEES !!!!

AGAIN IT IS PROVED THAT THE CITIZENS CHARTER IS A MOCKERY OF CENTRAL GOVT WHERE IN CRORES SPENT WITH NO TANGIBLE SOLUTIONS GIVEN BY NODAL DEPARTMENT LIKE DOPT!!!!!!!


DOPT, A NODAL AGENCY WITH SUPERORDINATE POWERS WASHING OFF IT'S RESPONSIBILITIES BY DIRECTING OUR QURIES TO THE SUBORDINATE COMMERCE MINISTRY WHICH HAS NO POWERS TO FORMULATE VRS SCHEMES TO CENTRAL GOVT.EMPLOYEES. THUS DOPT ALSO IS TRYING TO COVERUP THE COMMERCE MINISTRY'S BLATANT FRAUD ON EMPLOYEES IN CHEATTING THEM THROUGH AN ILLEGAL EXECUTIVE FIAT FRAUDULANTLY.


TO GIVE THE FOLLOWING EVASIVE REPLY THROUGH THE PRESIDENTS SECRATRIAT DOPT HAS TAKEN ONE LONG YEAR. INSTEAD OF TAKING CORRECTIVE MEASURES DOPT TRIES TO COVERUP THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAUD COMMITTED ON EMPLOYEES WHO WERE COVERED BY CCS PENSION RULES OF 1972. I HAVE APPROCHED DOPT FOR JUSTICE, DOPT INSTEAD OF GIVING ITS DECISION DIRECTS THE COMMERCE MINISTRY-WHICH COMMITTED THE FRAUD TO ANSWER!!!!!!!ACCUSED GIVES THE VERDICT.






Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2009/01246


Name : Shri Venkatesan.M


Date of Receipt : 27 Jul 2009


Current Status : Case disposed of


Date of Action : 06 Jul 2010


Details : The matter does not concern DOPT. Forwarded to Department of Commerce vide O.M.No.23011/4/2009-P.G. dated 5.10.2009 who have further forwarded the representation to EI&EP Section of Department of Commerce vide their letter No. 1/34/2009-TFS dated 21.12.2009 for disposal.

I HAVE APPROCHED DOPT FOR JUSTICE, DOPT INSTEAD OF GIVING ITS DECISION as per the DOPTcircular.F.No.27/8/2007/EO/SM.II Dt.28.12.2007 it DIRECTS THE COMMERCE MINISTRY-WHICH COMMITTED THE FRAUD TO ANSWER!!!!!!!

If DOPT is not concerned with Export inspection agency’s 1994 SVRS, HOW DOPT VRS CIRCULAR WAS ISSUED TO THE SAME DEPARTMENT IN 2002 ?

TRUTH ULTIMATELY TRIUMPHS !!! HOPE SOON COMMERCE MINISTRY'S FRAUD ALSO WILL COME TO LIGHT THROUGH THE INDIAN JUDICIARY.

I feel vindicated, says Kargil war hero : India Today - Latest Breaking News from India, World, Business, Cricket, Sports, Bollywood.
I feel vindicated, says Kargil war hero : India Today -

TRUTH ULTIMATELY TRIUMPHS !!! HOPE SOON COMMERCE MINISTRY'S FRAUD ALSO WILL COME TO LIGHT THROUGH THE INDIAN JUDICIARY.

The army faced a huge embarrassment with the Armed Forces Tribunal raising serious questions over the Kargil war history. A verdict in the favour of Kargil war hero Brigadier Devinder Singh came as a slap on the face of the army's Kargil war commanders.

The tribunal has questioned the veracity of entire history of the Kargil war. Brigadier Singh, who commanded the 70 Infantry Brigade during the war, personally led what most military experts agree was the hardest campaign of the Kargil war.

But his top commanders fabricated war records to deny the recognition due to Brigadier Singh and his brigade. After a bitter decade-long fight, the army has been forced to set the record straight about his performance in the war.

After years of endless petitioning and court appearances, the retired brigadier finally got justice on Wednesday when the tribunal upheld his petition against his top commanders. The tribunal lashed out at former 15 Corps commander Lt Gen Kishan Pal for being prejudiced and biased.

The judgement came as a great relief for Brigadier Singh who, despite a great deal of battle valour, received a relatively low-order peace-time decoration and was passed over for a promotion by the army.

"There is a sense of relief for me and my brigade after the tribunal's verdict. I am getting congratulatory calls from my team," Brigadier Singh told Headlines Today.

"Our stand has been vindicated. We had felt hurt when someone else got the credit," he said. "The tribunal has said that he (Lt Gen Kishan Pal) was biased and that none of his reports about me is tenable."

"This was a battle for honour and the facts are out now," Brigadier Singh said.

Brigadier Singh's feat
Brigadier Singh had commanded the 70 Infantry Brigade in the Batalik sector during the Kargil war. He led the critical battle for Point 5203, which had been quickly overrun by Pakistani troops in the early days of the war. He also led the assaults on the Jubbar complex, one of the most difficult campaigns during the war.

A month before the operations broke out during a corps-level war game, Brigadier Singh had also predicted the pattern of intrusions by Pakistan Army regulars but Lt Gen Kishan Pal, the then 15 Corps Commander, doctored his battle performance report to underplay his role.

Brigadier Singh became a victim of prejudice and that cost him a war medal. He was recommended for a Mahavir Chakra, the second highest award for gallantry but was awarded a Vishisht Seva Medal, a peacetime decoration.

ACCUSED GIVES JUDGMENT!!!

ACCUSED GIVES JUDGMENT!!!

From.

Venkatesan.M                                                                  Ref: 2010/0426

16, Raja Apartments,15 (5A) B.K.N street,

Westmambalam, Chennai-33

To.

          Shri.Anurag Saxena.,

The Director, Trade Finance Section,

Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Udyog bhavan,NewDelhi-110107.

Email: anurag.saxena@nic.in

Sir,          Sub: Unsolicited letter No.1/34/2009-TFS dt.20^th.April 2010.

          Ref: Ref: PRSEC/E/2009/01246 dt.27/7/2009 forwarded to Department of Personnel and Training on 30^th.July2009.

Being a subordinate department to The Department of Personnel and Training, you are not competent to reply my grievance petition which was transferred to DOPT and not to EIC or Commerce Ministry. Don’t waste my time by forwarding EIC’s letters. As such my grievance petition sent to DOPT cannot be closed by an official of Commerce Ministry which is not competent to do so.

 This is for your kind information.

 Sincerely Yours,

VENKATESAN.M
C.C to 1. President's Secretariat 2. Shri Rajeev Kapoor,Joint Secretary (AT & A),DOPT.

 http://venkym.blogspot.com
http://citizenscharters-amockery.blogspot.com/

LEARN FROM DOPT ON HOW TO AVOID RESPONSIBILITIES !!!!!

Venkatesan Muthukrishnan  to jsata

show details 09:23 (3 minutes ago)

To.
Attn:Shri Rajeev Kapoor       Ref:20100407
Joint Secretary (AT & A)
Room No. 193, North Block,New Delhi.

Sir,    Sub:PRSEC/E/2009/01246-27July/2009
                PRSEC/E/2010/03560-08 Mar 2010

My both petitions still not answered by DOPT.Please expedite at the earliest.
Thanking you.
Sincerely Yours,
Venkatesan.M

Unanswered Grievance Petition-PRSEC/E/2009/01246 - Dt.27/7/2009

"Unanswered Grievance Petition-PRSEC/E/2009/01246"

show details 20:24 (11 minutes ago)


From.

Venkatesan.M Ref:DOPT- 2010/0327

16, Raja Apartments,15 (5A) B.K.N street,

Westmambalam, Chennai-33

To.

Dr. Syamal Kumar Sarkar, Joint Secretary (AT&A),

Department of Personnel and Training,

Room No. 109, North Block, New Delhi. Mail ID: jsata@nic.in



Sir,

Sub: Illegal SVRS & clandestine actions of Commerce Ministry to cheat the employees covered under CCS Pension Rules-1972.

Ref: PRSEC/E/2009/01246 forwarded to you on 30th.July2009-Unanswered.

Ref: DOPTcircular.F.No.27/8/2007/EO/SM.II Dt.28.12.2007

DOPT letter No.134/2005-Estt (A) Dt.17.08.2005



As I have been asked to liaise in the matter directly with Joint Secretary (AT&A), Department of Personnel and Training, I am sending this letter.

Instead of giving your direct reply you are evading your responsibility by directing the subordinate Export Inspection Council to answer my grievance which is neither authorized by you nor competent. Irony is that The Ministry of commerce which has issued the ILLEGAL SVRS circular now referred the matter to DOPT vide letter No.2/130/2009-EI & EP dt.24/12/2009 about the infringement of Allocation of Business Rules of GOI.

Since no reply is received till date from your end, I request you to give your categorical reply to my grievance at the earliest.

Thanking you.

Sincerely Yours,

Sign..bmp

27th.March 2010.

Chennai-33"

:: President's Secretariat Helpline ::NO REPLY EVE AFTER 8 MONTHS

:: President's Secretariat Helpline :::

I- Grievance Registration Number is : PRSEC/E/2009/01246-27th.JULY.2009

II-"Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2010/03560-08 Mar 2010

Name : Shri venkatesan.M
Date of Receipt : 08 Mar 2010
Current Status : The petition is transferred
Date of Transfer : 22 Mar 2010
Ministry/Department : Department of Personnel and Training
Officer's Name : Dr. Syamal Kumar Sarkar
Designation : Joint Secretary (AT&A)
Address : Room No. 109, North Block
New Delhi

Telephone No. : 23094010
E Mail : jsata@nic.in

Note: You are requested to further liaise in the matter directly with Joint Secretary (AT&A), Department of Personnel and Training, Room No. 109, North BlockNew Delhi for further information."

EVEN SUPREME COURT MAKE RTI-A MOCKERY

Is SC trying to deny applicant info under RTI? - India - The Times of India: "NEW DELHI: For somebody who has made no secret of his hostility to RTI, CJI K G Balakrishnan has outdone himself. For, without getting into the nitty-gritty of RTI clauses, the Supreme Court has come up with a novel excuse for denying information. It has just said that the application had been 'placed before' the CJI himself and that he had not ordered any action on it.

Responding to Kashmiri political leader Abdul Gani Bhat on February 26, the central public information officer (CPIO) of the apex court, Raj Pal Arora, made no reference to any of the 10 categories of information exempted from disclosure under Section 8 of RTI. Instead, while saying that the application had been placed before Justice Balakrishnan, Arora gave no explanation for deviating from the statutory norm under which the CJI has no decision-making role on whether certain information could be disclosed or not.

The official involvement of Justice Balakrishnan in the CPIO's decision makes a mockery of the remedy available to Bhat under RTI to file his first appeal before a superior officer in the Supreme Court registry, M K Gupta. For, Gupta would hardly be in a position to sit in judgment over the inaction of Justice Balakrishnan.

Having referred the application to the CJI, the CPIO washed his hands off it saying, 'No action having been directed thereon, the same was lodged/filed. Further no information is available.' It's as if the invocation of the CJI's name empowers the Supreme Court's CPIO to bypass the general obligation of disclosure put on him by RTI.

The apex court's latest attempt to undermine RTI is despite the fact that five of the eight documents sought by Bhat relate to administrative orders passed by the registry declaring the Supreme Court premises as 'high security zone' and imposing restrictions on the movements of petitioners-in-person. The other three pieces of information asked for by Bhat relate to the more sensitive information on the proposal to appoint a judge from the Jammu and Kashmir high court, Justice N A Kakru, as chief justice of the Andhra Pradesh high court.

The evasive response to Bhat's application came around the time Justice Balakrishnan directed the head of the registry to file an appeal before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Delhi high court in the judges' assets case. It was in that case that the Supreme Court had on the administrative side originally claimed that CJI did not fall under the ambit of RTI. But in the course of the proceedings before the Delhi HC, the SC conceded that the CJI too was accountable under RTI."

I-REMINDER TO CIC

DOPT BREAKING RULES WHICH THEY MADE !!!!!!!!!!!

"To.
The Secretary,Central Infn. Commission,
New Delhi.

Sir,
Sub: RTI application ignored by DOPT
Please look in to the matter & initiate appropriate action at the earliest.

*RTI application sent to CPIO of DOPT on 13/01/2010 (copy attached-scan0003)

*I Reminder on 14/02/2010 to Appellate authority.

*II Reminder on 2/02/2010 to Appellate authority (email copies forwarded 23/02/2010)

* Copy of fax message sent to the secretary,DOPT on 22/10/2009

thanking you.
VENKATESAN.M"

Gmail - Personal Request - venkym1@gmail.com

Gmail - Personal Request - venkym1@gmail.com: "Respected Sir,

I got your contact address from the site http://venkym.blogspot.com/2009/08/from.html. We have an IFS(B) Service Association in the Ministry of External Affair s. We want to take up a matter with DOPT regarding the unconstitutional and arbitrary action being taken by the cadre controlling authorities in MEA.

In this regard, we need a copy of DOPT Circular F.No.27/8/2007/EO/SM.II Dt.28.12.2007, that you have referred to in your application addressed to Dr. Syamal Kumar Sarkar, Joint Secretary (AT&A). This circular is not available in the DOPT website. We shall be grateful you could please scan the circular and send a copy at my e-mail id.

Looking forward to your kind cooperation, and wishing you a healthy and happy retirement life,

Warm regards,

Narendra Sahoo
Assistant
Embassy of India, Algiers"

FINAL REMINDER TO DOPT !!!!!!!!

FINAL REMINDER TO DOPT -SECRETARY SENT TODAY
"SHANTANU CONSUL" , 

Fight Corruption Now: How long Should One Wait?

Fight Corruption Now: How long Should One Wait?: "Even Senior officers today do not tolerate honest opinion

Today my Secretary can write a note opposed to my views. I have given that freedom to all my Secretaries. I have told them, ‘If you do not give your honest opinion for fear that it will displease your Minister, please then, you had better go.’ I will never be displeased over a frank expression of opinion — Sardar Patel’s advice to Secretaries"

RTI application ignored by DOPT

Gmail - No response from DOPT for my RTI application - venkym1@gmail.com: "From: : M.Venkatesan,
16, Raja apartments, 15/5A-B.K.N Street,
Westmambalam,
CHENNAI-600 033
email ID : venkym1@gmail.com

To.
The Secretary,Central Infn. Commission,
New Delhi.

Sir,
Sub: RTI application ignored by DOPT
Please look in to the matter & initiate appropriate action at the earliest.

*RTI application sent to CPIO of DOPT on 13/01/2010 (copy attached-scan0003)

*I Reminder on 14/02/2010 to Appellate authority.

*II Reminder on 2/02/2010 to Appellate authority (email copies forwarded 23/02/2010)

* Copy of fax message sent to the secretary,DOPT on 22/10/2009

thanking you.
VENKATESAN.M


Please visit http://venkym.blogspot.com
http://citizenscharters-amockery.blogspot.com/"

:: President's Secretariat Helpline ::

:: President's Secretariat Helpline :::

Even after 7 months!!!!!!!!!!!!
Grievance Status as on 22/02/2010

Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2009/01246
Name : Shri Venkatesan.M
Date of Receipt : 27 Jul 2009
Current Status : This request/grievance is under process in
President's Secretariat
Date of Action : 28 Aug 2009"

REMINDER-II TO APPELLATE AUTHORITY-19/02/2010

Gmail - Reminder-I - venkym1@gmail.com: "Shri P.Prabhakaran
Deputy Secretary (Estt)(Appellate authority)
D/o.Personnel & Training,North Block,New Delhi.

Sir,
Sub: Information sought under RTI Act from CPIO regarding my fax message to the SECRETARY,Department of Personnel and Training.-Ref:2009/09.
Ref:RTI application-ref:2009/14 sent to CPIO on13/01/2010.

NOT RECEIVED ANY REPLY FROM CPIO.PLEASE EXPEDITE.

THANKS & REGARDS,
VENKATESAN.M
c.c to CIC"

DOPT-LAW MAKERS ARE REAL LAW BREAKERS

My application under RTI-Act 2005 sent to CPIO of DOPT on 13/01/2010 (Ref:2009/14) regarding status report of my fax to the SECRETARY,DOPT has not been replied sofar.

I have sent a REMINDER-I to the Appellate authority,DOPT asking to EXPEDITE.

                -VENKATESAN.M

RTI-CPIO directs the applicant to read acts published in EIC website !!!!!

Dear Mr.KTNS,
I know pretty well that you will receive such a noncommittal & evasive replies from all CPIO's of various ministries in Delhi - a ploy of Govt. officials. That is called a MOCKERY for which crores of rupees spent on fat salaries for CPIO & Apellate Authorities. Ultimately you won't get any tangible reply or solutions for yr queries which force us to judiciary & media finally.
For your specific question the MOST LEARNED DEPUTY DIRECTOR of EIC is asking you to read the website & this is how the Govt.machinary works.However please appeal to the Appellate Authority with a copy to CIC & my website.
Thanks & regards,
VENKATESAN.M
Mob:9444030900
Skype:venkym9971

Please visit http://venkym.blogspot.com
http://citizenscharters-amockery.blogspot.com/
http://prostatecarcinoma.blogspot.com/

Indian Military : Service Benefits and Issues: DoPT losing its marbles ??? Asks Information Commissioners to hold hearings collectively and not as separate benches !!!

Indian Military : Service Benefits and Issues: DoPT losing its marbles ??? Asks Information Commissioners to hold hearings collectively and not as separate benches !!!: "Beniwal said...

Babus are trying for long to get out of RTI cluches, because they have lot to hide. They behave like emperor and not public's servant. Todays Times of India report on RTI is the real intentions of babus and the polititians are with them, because next in line are polititions who gets/spend crores but donot want anyone to know how/where it went. I hope public at large and RTI activist will block all efforts of babus to be not accountable of public money.
June 19, 2009 10:51 AM"

Can a govt. official be punished by law for his malice action? - Google Search

Can a govt. official be punished by law for his malice action? - Google Search

STATUS EVEN AFTER 6 MONTHS

:: President's Secretariat Helpline :::
"Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2009/01246
Name : Shri Venkatesan.M
Date of Receipt : 27 Jul 2009
Current Status : This request/grievance is under process in
President's Secretariat
Date of Action : 28 Aug 2009"

Additional Affidavit filed for 28th January hearing

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                       (special original jurisdiction)             W.P. No. 10442 of 2008

                       MP.3/2009 TO IMPLEAD DOPT IN WP 10442/2008

M.Venkatesan -                                                           …….   Applicant/Petitioner

Vs

1. Union of India,represented by the Secretary,Ministry of Commerce & Industry

Department of Commerce ,Udyog Bhawan,New Delhi.

2. The Director,Export Inspection Council,(Ministry of Commerce), No.26, Pragati Towers,11^th Floor, Rajendra Place,New Delhi 110 008.

3. The Additional Director, Export Inspection Agency (Chennai),(Ministry of Commerce),No.213, Royapettah High Road,Chennai – 600 014.                                                                                   ….Respondents/Respondents

4. The Department of Personnel & Training,Rep. by its Secretary,

Ministry of Personnel,Public Grievances & Pension,North Block,

New Delhi-110 001.                           …..4^th Respondent/Proposed Party

AFFIDAVIT OF M.VENKATESAN-FILED IN PERSON ON 25/01/2010

The applicant petitioner humbly submits as follows:

Following points will decide that whether 1994-SVRS is correct in law or not. Present petition filed on 17.04.2008 & directives issued to respondents by the Hon’ble High Court. If SVRS is in accordance with law the respondents would have filed the counter in time. Since it has not been done so, it indicates the lack of statutory provisions.

1.  To avoid misuse of power, Allocation of Business Rules-1961 under clause 77/3 of the Constitution empowered only Dept.of Personnel & Training as NODAL dept. for framing rules/regulations with regard to Govt. personnel. All other ministries have to implement the same.

     2. Commerce Ministry is a subordinate ministry which has no powers to   frame schemes for personnel.

     3. Any VRS should have the approval of DOPT or be passed by a Parliament session. Since 1994- SVRS has no statutory backing, it is just an executive fiat liable to be set-aside by the Hon’ble high court under Article 226.

    4. Commerce Ministry’s original circular was edited deliberately to suppress vital information-a clandestine act to cheat Govt. employees who were covered by the CCS Pension Rules-1972.

My service record:

Date of joining in service-Export Inspection Agency (EIA)  08.03.1973 as Technical Officer

Date of leaving fm EIA             08.07.1994 as Asst.Director

 It is submitted that there is No time latch in filing the Writ and the sequence of events are given below:

Sequence of events:

1. VRS announced in May-1994 by circular dt.21/5/1994 (Annexure-I)

2. Asked for clarifications vide letters dt. 30/05/1994 & 06/06/1994.

3. EIA asked me first to opt VRS vide letter dt.31.5.1994 (Annexure-II)

4. Opted for VRS on 08.07.1994 assuming that the scheme introduced by the Respondents was a valid one. 

5. Relieved on 19.07.1994 with 3month’s notice pay. 

6. Work sheet (on benefits) given on 24.10.1994 ( 3 months delay, otherwise I would have filed the writ before I got relieved from my service.)

7. I payment taken under protest on 21.01.1995 (though promised to settle   in one month.)  

8. II payment received under protest on 03.08.1995.      

9. III payment received under protest on 06.10.1997. ( delay of 27months) 

10. First WP.16155/1997 filed for DR.

11. DOPT replied in a letter dt.17/8/2005 that it approved only one SVRS-2002                                                                       (Annexure-III)

12. Original circular of Commerce ministry received under RTI Act-2005 changed the cause of action totally.  (Annexure-IV)

 I was forced to file the present petition WP.10442/2008 challenging the Scheme when my appeal for a settlement was turned down. (Annexure-V)

As the above said four vital points which are important to decide the writ, has not been answered till date by the respondent department, it is deemed that the VRS itself is not supported by any statutory provisions of government of India and it has to be struck down. I pray the Hon’ble court to pass appropriate order in terms the submissions made above.

(VENKATESAN.M)

Chennai

Back to Commerce Ministry-which violated the constitutional provisions

Gmail - documents for perusal - venkym1@gmail.com:
"                                                  Ref: 2009/15Dt20/01/2010
To. Ms. Kiran Puri, Director EP(OP), EP(ECS), Service Export, Export Inspection, GRC.
Dear Sir,
Ref: NO.1/34/2009-TFS Dt.21.12.2009.
Please expedite my grievance petition forwarded to you by Shri.Anurag Saxena as soon as possible.

Thanking you,
Sincerely yours,
Venkatesan.M"

Information Sought under RTI Act-2005

BACK TO DOPT

                    MOCKERY OF CITIZENS CHARTER !!!!!

Commerce Ministry- a subordinate ministry, which implemented stealthily an ILLEGAL VRS in 1994 through an executive fiat in total violation of all Constitutional provisions is now directing DOPT (Department of personnel & training) to give the reply for our queries on the competence of commerce ministry. (see the attachment)

Anyway now the ball is in the DOPT’s court.

DOPT which alone is empowered as NODAL Agency with superordinate powers by The Allocation of Business Rules & Transaction of Business Rules under clause 77/3 of the Constitution has been evading its responsibilities inspite of our continuous efforts in this regard.

At least now DOPT is bound to declare the SVRS-1994 of Commerce Ministry as NULL & VOID without further delay and issue suitable directives in this matter.

PLEASE CLICK THE IMAGE FOR BETTER VIEWING

TRUTH TRIMPHS ULTIMATELY

EIC has been continuously bluffing the employees that it has consulted the DOPT regarding SVRS-1994.Now the following Commerce ministry's letter proves that it is false.This letter is another proof to establish the FRAUD committed on EIA/EIC employees.
COMMERCE MINISTRY A SUBORDINATE MINISTRY IS NOT COMPETENT TO OFFER VRS SCHEMES.SO PLEASE SEND TELEGRAMS TO THE PRIME MINISTERS OFFICE ABOUT THIS FRAUD.
Please click on the image for better viewing:

Ministry of Personnel Dept. forwards to Pension & Pensioners Welfare dept.

PENSION DEPARTMENTS REPLY

PLEASE CLICK THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE